All-Terrain Lawn Tractor Forum

Like riding lawn tractors through mud, woods, rocks, and snow? Then this is the place for you! Share your ideas, Post your projects and more!
 
PortalHomeFAQSearchMemberlistRegisterLog inCountdown Timer
Swing by the Chatroom anytime! Next Chat Event - 12/16/2017 @ 8:00pm EST .
Welcome to the All Terrain Lawn Tractor Forum!
Voting for the 2017 Build-Off has ended! Click Here to view results!
The prize list has been finalized! Check out what's up for grabs by clicking here!
The new 2017 ATLTF stickers are in! View them here, and order yours while they're hot!
We now have a Discord chat server! Contact Doug for an invite link!

Share | 
 

 peerless vs spicer question

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: peerless vs spicer question   Sat May 11, 2013 1:28 pm

Maybe this has been asked before - and I know the consensus is that the peerless is a superior brand of transaxle compared to most -

BUT -

Why do people dislike the spicer so much? I've had 3 spicers and just as many or more of peerless. With the exception of the peerless transmissions for chain drive, they have not put up with any more abuse than the spicer/foote transaxles (in my experience anyway), even being prepped for such abuse. Even going so far as rigging up axle truss type supports to stiffen the housings.

Again, why do people say the peerless is so much better?

It kind of reminds me of a debate that a farmer friend and I had about tecumseh vs briggs engines.... we both had our pros (he being pro tecumseh) and few cons....
Back to top Go down
MowBandit
Skilled
Skilled
avatar

Age : 21
Join date : 2013-03-16
Posts : 477
Forum Rep : 0
Location : Haddock,Georgia

PostSubject: Re: peerless vs spicer question   Sat May 11, 2013 4:23 pm

ive had only a hand ful of peerless transaxles and gearboxes ve had more spicer's then anything i did notice that peerless transaxles feel like there built better but the 700 series ive had lots of trouble with the shift key in it ad a foote gearbox and it worked great for the time i had it ive had a peerless 600 h pattern and it was a good transaxle just had shiting probloms but my spicer did have 1 error and thats locking it ive blew the bottom casing on it once from having it locked and pulling some stuff overall i think spicer and peerless are great but o have some probloms
Back to top Go down
Stretch44875
Administrator
Administrator
avatar

Age : 43
Join date : 2012-04-05
Posts : 935
Forum Rep : 1
Location : Mansfield, Ohio

PostSubject: Re: peerless vs spicer question   Sun May 12, 2013 9:48 am

From what I've seen, the peerless have bearings instead of bushings, and higher quality gears.

I've had a spicer in one of the tractors, and it did great for many years.


They all will fail under abuse. We have gone to the peerless 820 series. They have 1 in axles, and beefier cases.
Back to top Go down
Doc Sprocket
Administrator
Administrator
avatar

Age : 44
Join date : 2013-04-21
Posts : 2862
Forum Rep : 9
Location : Ontario Canada

PostSubject: Re: peerless vs spicer question   Sun May 12, 2013 10:58 am

SOME Peerless models have bearings for the mainshaft, countershaft, and/or axles. Most simply use the bronze oilite bushings. They usually have bearings only on the input shaft.

I suspect this is very much a Ford/Chevy thing- a matter of personal preference- with a smattering of MISinformation thrown in for good measure. For example, Tecumseh carbs seem to have a bad reputation and are generally dismissed as junk. Mostly due to one idiot having a bad time with one, and spreading the word. On the other hand, I LOVE Tec Series 1 carbs, and snap one up every chance I get...

_______________________________________________
***Get YOUR official "Doc Locked, And Ready To Rock!" Stickers by clicking here!***
***Official Sprocket's Garage vinyl graphics and tees for sale HERE!***

Put down the wrench, and come out with your hands up!-Doc "Tranny Crusher" Sprocket, ATLTF Forum Admin, Thinkerer and Tinkerer, and all-around good dood. Wink

Gen. Mayhem- http://www.atltf.com/t2597-general-mayhem-race-tractor
MULE- http://www.atltf.com/t2153-lawn-boy-utltv
MULEII- http://www.atltf.com/t3328-1970-john-deere-112-the-beginnings-of-mule-ii
MULEIII http://www.atltf.com/t4263-mule3-brainstorming-ideas-etc#58287
Wrench, Wheel, Wreck, Repeat...
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: peerless vs spicer question   Sun May 12, 2013 4:27 pm

it really wasn't a Ford vs Chevy type of question. Rather, it was trying to clarify why people seem to prefer the peerless over the Spicer. It seems to me that it is a matter of personal preference more than of proven durability or reliability because as you say they all will break in time. Just like locked or unlocked rear end. I was merely curious of other people's opinion on the matter. I have heard the same for and against many times. I really just want to know why people think that's the peerless is better overall because I don't see it that way
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: peerless vs spicer question   

Back to top Go down
 
peerless vs spicer question
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» peerless vs spicer question
» Peerless (205?) hydrostat question
» Question about making a drain for my peerless 814
» Spicer to Peerless
» Pulley Question

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
All-Terrain Lawn Tractor Forum :: Technical Forum :: Drivetrain & Brake Tech :: Transaxles and Transmissions-
Jump to: